编程语言
从热度、使用率、喜爱程度与想用意愿,比较编程语言生态。
数据更新于
数据来源
语言热度领先
Python20.86%2026 年 11 月开发者使用领先
JavaScript62%2026 年调查开发者喜爱领先
Elm94.1%2026 年调查开发者想用领先
Python33.4%2026 年调查
语言热度
搜索关注度指数,不代表开发者使用率。
2026 年 11 月月度指数
选择语言
查看数据
Python20.86%
C11.48%
Java8.89%
C++8.35%
C#3.39%
JavaScript2.42%
R2.27%
SQL1.91%
Visual Basic1.88%
Go1.69%
Rust1.63%
PHP1.58%
Fortran1.21%
Scratch1.15%
Perl1.14%
MATLAB1.08%
Assembly language0.92%
Swift0.89%
Delphi/Object Pascal0.78%
Dart0.74%
VBScript0.71%
Classic Visual Basic0.69%
Julia0.68%
COBOL0.67%
ABAP0.67%
SAS0.66%
PL/SQL0.62%
Ada0.61%
Objective-C0.6%
Ruby0.54%
Prolog0.52%
Lua0.49%
Kotlin0.44%
OCaml0.43%
D0.41%
Lisp0.41%
Ladder Logic0.38%
Scala0.34%
Haskell0.28%
Caml0.26%
TypeScript0.26%
GML0.25%
ML0.25%
Xojo0.25%
(Visual) FoxPro0.24%
XSLT0.23%
Transact-SQL0.23%
LabVIEW0.23%
Solidity0.23%
Clojure0.23%
TIOBE Index ↗采集于 2026-11-12
公开 Top50(21—50 名为来源补充表)轻触柱形查看完整名称与数值
开发者使用
受访者过去一年使用过的语言,问卷允许多选。
2026 年调查全部受访者
选择语言
查看数据
JavaScript62%
SQL58.4%
HTML/CSS58.2%
Python58%
Bash/Shell (all shells)51.3%
TypeScript43.8%
Java27.6%
C#27.1%
PowerShell24.6%
C++24.3%
C21.8%
Rust18%
PHP17.7%
Go16.5%
Kotlin10.8%
Lua9.4%
Assembly7.2%
Swift5.9%
Ruby5.8%
Other5.2%
Dart4.9%
R4.5%
Nix4.4%
GDScript4%
Visual Basic (.Net)4%
Groovy3.9%
VBA3.9%
Perl3.8%
MATLAB3.6%
Zig2.8%
MicroPython2.7%
Elixir2.6%
Lisp2.6%
Objective-C2.5%
Haskell2.3%
Scala2.2%
Delphi1.9%
Fortran1.7%
Erlang1.5%
Julia1.5%
Clojure1.3%
Ada1.2%
F#1.2%
Gleam1.2%
OCaml1.2%
COBOL1.1%
Prolog0.9%
Solidity0.8%
Mojo0.6%
Odin0.2%
Elm0.1%
Stack Overflow Developer Survey ↗采集于 2026-11-12
All Respondents;原问卷含编程、脚本和标记语言轻触柱形查看完整名称与数值
开发者喜爱
已经使用这门语言的人中,希望继续使用的比例。
2026 年调查全部受访者
选择语言
查看数据
Elm94.1%
Odin82.4%
Rust67.4%
Elixir62.1%
Zig58.3%
Nix56.8%
Lisp55.4%
GDScript53.8%
TypeScript53%
Gleam52.3%
OCaml51.5%
SQL51.4%
Python50.6%
C#50%
Go49.5%
Erlang49.1%
Clojure48.7%
Swift48.5%
Assembly48.3%
F#48.3%
Bash/Shell (all shells)48.1%
Haskell47.8%
HTML/CSS47.8%
Julia47.4%
C45.9%
C++45.8%
Mojo45.1%
Kotlin43.1%
Ruby42.4%
Dart42.3%
JavaScript42%
Solidity41.5%
Lua40.8%
R40.7%
Scala39.2%
Java38.5%
Ada38.4%
MicroPython37%
Delphi36%
PHP35.7%
Prolog34.1%
Fortran33.1%
PowerShell31.5%
Perl30.7%
COBOL28%
Visual Basic (.Net)25.5%
MATLAB24.4%
Groovy21.9%
Objective-C21.3%
VBA20.1%
Stack Overflow Developer Survey ↗采集于 2026-11-12
小样本语言可能有较高喜爱比例,单项样本基数未提供,请结合使用率查看。轻触柱形查看完整名称与数值
开发者想用
受访者接下来希望使用的语言,包括已经在用的人。
2026 年调查全部受访者
选择语言
查看数据
Python33.4%
SQL32%
HTML/CSS29%
JavaScript27.8%
TypeScript27.5%
Rust26.3%
Bash/Shell (all shells)25.8%
Go17.7%
C#16.5%
C++15.8%
C14.2%
Java13.1%
Kotlin9.4%
PowerShell8.7%
Zig8%
PHP7.6%
Assembly6.8%
Lua6.4%
Swift5.3%
Elixir4.7%
Haskell4.5%
Nix4.3%
Dart4.1%
Ruby4.1%
GDScript4%
Lisp3.5%
R3.3%
Erlang2.8%
Gleam2.7%
OCaml2.6%
Clojure2.5%
Julia2.5%
Scala2.5%
MicroPython2.4%
F#2.3%
Perl2.2%
Ada1.8%
MATLAB1.8%
Visual Basic (.Net)1.8%
Fortran1.7%
Groovy1.7%
COBOL1.5%
Mojo1.5%
Objective-C1.5%
Prolog1.5%
Delphi1.4%
VBA1.4%
Solidity1.1%
Odin0.5%
Elm0.1%
Stack Overflow Developer Survey ↗采集于 2026-11-12
All Respondents;原问卷含编程、脚本和标记语言轻触柱形查看完整名称与数值
语言横向对照
把关注度、实际使用与未来意愿放在一起看,也看看热度相比去年如何变化。
| 语言 | TIOBE 热度 指数 / 排名 | 热度同比 百分点 | 去年名次 今年变动 | 使用比例 SO 调查 | 使用人数 SO 调查 | 喜爱比例 使用者继续使用 | 想用比例 SO 调查 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.42%#6 | -1.00 | #6持平 | 62% | 8,742 | 42% | 27.8% | |
| 1.91%#8 | +0.11 | #10↑2 | 58.4% | 8,237 | 51.4% | 32% | |
| — | — | — | 58.2% | 8,212 | 47.8% | 29% | |
| 20.86%#1 | -2.51 | #1持平 | 58% | 8,184 | 50.6% | 33.4% | |
| — | — | — | 51.3% | 7,231 | 48.1% | 25.8% | |
| 0.26%#41 | — | — | 43.8% | 6,171 | 53% | 27.5% | |
| 8.89%#3 | +0.34 | #4↑1 | 27.6% | 3,885 | 38.5% | 13.1% | |
| 3.39%#5 | -4.26 | #5持平 | 27.1% | 3,826 | 50% | 16.5% | |
| — | — | — | 24.6% | 3,472 | 31.5% | 8.7% | |
| 8.35%#4 | -0.60 | #3↓1 | 24.3% | 3,425 | 45.8% | 15.8% | |
| 11.48%#2 | +1.80 | #2持平 | 21.8% | 3,070 | 45.9% | 14.2% | |
| 1.63%#11 | +0.25 | #14↑3 | 18% | 2,542 | 67.4% | 26.3% | |
| 1.58%#12 | +0.27 | #16↑4 | 17.7% | 2,490 | 35.7% | 7.6% | |
| 1.69%#10 | -0.03 | #11↑1 | 16.5% | 2,332 | 49.5% | 17.7% | |
| 0.44%#33 | — | — | 10.8% | 1,524 | 43.1% | 9.4% | |
| 0.49%#32 | — | — | 9.4% | 1,327 | 40.8% | 6.4% | |
| — | — | — | 7.2% | 1,020 | 48.3% | 6.8% | |
| 0.89%#18 | +0.03 | #21↑3 | 5.9% | 831 | 48.5% | 5.3% | |
| 0.54%#30 | — | — | 5.8% | 823 | 42.4% | 4.1% | |
| — | — | — | 5.2% | 733 | — | — | |
| 0.74%#20 | +0.05 | #26↑6 | 4.9% | 697 | 42.3% | 4.1% | |
| 2.27%#7 | +0.60 | #12↑5 | 4.5% | 639 | 40.7% | 3.3% | |
| — | — | — | 4.4% | 623 | 56.8% | 4.3% | |
| — | — | — | 4% | 571 | 53.8% | 4% | |
| — | — | — | 4% | 557 | 25.5% | 1.8% | |
| — | — | — | 3.9% | 544 | 21.9% | 1.7% | |
| — | — | — | 3.9% | 552 | 20.1% | 1.4% | |
| 1.14%#15 | -0.69 | #9↓6 | 3.8% | 538 | 30.7% | 2.2% | |
| 1.08%#16 | -0.30 | #15↓1 | 3.6% | 513 | 24.4% | 1.8% | |
| — | — | — | 2.8% | 398 | 58.3% | 8% | |
| — | — | — | 2.7% | 384 | 37% | 2.4% | |
| — | — | — | 2.6% | 367 | 62.1% | 4.7% | |
| 0.41%#36 | — | — | 2.6% | 368 | 55.4% | 3.5% | |
| 0.6%#29 | — | — | 2.5% | 357 | 21.3% | 1.5% | |
| 0.28%#39 | — | — | 2.3% | 324 | 47.8% | 4.5% | |
| 0.34%#38 | — | — | 2.2% | 309 | 39.2% | 2.5% | |
| — | — | — | 1.9% | 267 | 36% | 1.4% | |
| 1.21%#13 | -0.34 | #13持平 | 1.7% | 239 | 33.1% | 1.7% | |
| — | — | — | 1.5% | 218 | 49.1% | 2.8% | |
| 0.68%#23 | — | — | 1.5% | 211 | 47.4% | 2.5% | |
| 0.23%#50 | — | — | 1.3% | 187 | 48.7% | 2.5% | |
| 0.61%#28 | — | — | 1.2% | 172 | 38.4% | 1.8% | |
| — | — | — | 1.2% | 172 | 48.3% | 2.3% | |
| — | — | — | 1.2% | 176 | 52.3% | 2.7% | |
| 0.43%#34 | — | — | 1.2% | 165 | 51.5% | 2.6% | |
| 0.67%#24 | — | — | 1.1% | 150 | 28% | 1.5% | |
| 0.52%#31 | — | — | 0.9% | 129 | 34.1% | 1.5% | |
| 0.23%#49 | — | — | 0.8% | 118 | 41.5% | 1.1% | |
| — | — | — | 0.6% | 82 | 45.1% | 1.5% | |
| — | — | — | 0.2% | 34 | 82.4% | 0.5% | |
| — | — | — | 0.1% | 17 | 94.1% | 0.1% | |
| 0.24%#45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.67%#25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.92%#17 | -0.24 | #18↑1 | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.26%#40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.69%#22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.41%#35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.78%#19 | -1.28 | #8↓11 | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.25%#42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.23%#48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.38%#37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.25%#43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.62%#27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.66%#26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 1.15%#14 | +0.13 | #19↑5 | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.23%#47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.71%#21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 1.88%#9 | -1.43 | #7↓2 | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.25%#44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 0.23%#46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
左右滑动查看完整指标 · — 表示该来源未收录或未提供
TIOBE 与 SO 的统计方法和时间范围不同,请分别解读。喜爱比例的分母是这门语言的使用者;使用、想用比例按原问卷定义统计。各列独立排序,不计算综合分。来源名称不同的条目分别保留。